Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39373309›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2024

Habitat structure and an introduced predator limit the abundance of an endangered ground-nesting bird.

David G Parker, Matthew Cameron, Christopher E Gordon, Mike Letnic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Habitat structure and an introduced predator limit the abundance of an endangered ground-nesting bird.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David G ParkerBiodiversity, Conservation and Science, NSW Department Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Albury, New South Wales, Australia.
Matthew CameronBiodiversity, Conservation and Science, NSW Department Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Albury, New South Wales, Australia.
Christopher E GordonEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Mike LetnicEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4191-8427

Funding

New South Wales Government
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the factors that limit the abundance of threatened species is critical for the development of effective conservation strategies. However, gaining such knowledge from monitoring programs and using it to inform decision-making for rare species can be difficult due to methodological issues posed by the problems of distinguishing true absences from false absences and the analysis of datasets dominated by zero counts. The plains-wanderer (Pedionomus torquatus) is a critically endangered ground-nesting bird that occurs in grasslands of southeastern Australia. Decline of the plains-wanderer has been attributed to habitat modification but little emphasis has been placed on the role of introduced predators, such as the red fox (Vulpes vulpes), which have had a devastating effect on small ground-dwelling vertebrates in dryland regions of Australia. Here, we use a 9-year time series of spotlight counts to investigate the impact of vegetation structure and fox presence on plains-wanderer occupancy and abundance. We used distance sampling to determine the effective strip width for sighting plains-wanderers during spotlight surveys. We then used a hurdle model approach whereby binomial generalized additive models were fitted to presence/absence data within the effective strip-width across all sites and negative-binomial models were fitted to an index of abundance at sites where plains-wanderers were observed. Plains-wanderer occupancy and abundance fluctuated markedly through time. Where foxes were absent, occupancy (but not abundance) of plains-wanderers showed a humped relationship with grass height with an optimal height between 50 and 150 mm. Where foxes were present however, this relationship broke down and plains-wanderers were rarely recorded. Our results suggest that plains-wanderers should benefit from management strategies that maintain grass height at optimal levels and exclude foxes or effectively suppress their populations. A key message from this study is that if statistical analyses of data generated by monitoring programs for rare species are intended to inform management decisions by identifying relationships between threatened species and drivers of their abundance, there should be consideration of analytic approaches that account for true and false zeroes, high prevalence of zeroes, and the possibility of nonlinear responses.

Indexed as

EcosystemEndangered SpeciesFoxesIntroduced SpeciesAnimalsAustraliaConservation of Natural ResourcesPasseriformesPopulation DensityPopulation DynamicsPredatory Behaviorgrasslandground‐nesting birdhabitat suitabilityintroduced predatorinvasive speciesmesopredatorplains‐wandererrainfallVulpes vulpeszero‐inflated

Identifiers

PMID39373309
PMCPMC11610650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.