Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39373261›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2024

Functional diversity of ground beetles improved aphid control but did not increase crop yields on European farms.

Roman Bucher, Péter Batáry, Julia Baudry, Léa Beaumelle, Andrea Čerevková, Enrique G de la Riva, Tara Dirilgen, Róbert Gallé, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Ewa Rembiałkowska and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Functional diversity of ground beetles improved aphid control but did not increase crop yields on European farms.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Roman BucherDepartment of Ecology, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3001-2876
Péter Batáry'Lendület' Landscape and Conservation Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1017-6996
Julia BaudrySorbonne Paris Nord University, Inserm U1153, INRAE U1125, CNAM, Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center - University of Paris (CRESS), Bobigny, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7919-6039
Léa BeaumelleFrench National Centre for Scientific Research CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7836-8767
Andrea ČerevkováInstitute of Parasitology SAS, Košice, Slovak Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9615-9870
Enrique G de la RivaArea of Ecology, Department of Biodiversity and Environmental Management, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of León, León, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3393-8375
Tara DirilgenSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9687-9651
Róbert Gallé'Lendület' Landscape and Conservation Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5516-8623
Emmanuelle Kesse-GuyotSorbonne Paris Nord University, Inserm U1153, INRAE U1125, CNAM, Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center - University of Paris (CRESS), Bobigny, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9715-3534
Ewa RembiałkowskaDepartment of Functional and Organic Food, WULS, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4109-5486
Adrien RuschINRAE, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, ISVV, SAVE, Villenave d'Ornon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3921-9750
Dara A StanleySchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8948-8409
Werner UlrichDepartment of Ecology and Biogeography, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8715-6619
Klaus BirkhoferDepartment of Ecology, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9301-2443

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)BiodivERsA3 ERA-Net COFUND Programme (2018-2019 BiodivERsA Joint Call) (FunProd)Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 662944Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) FIP 16/1Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 2019-NC-MS-11Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office NKFIH KKP 133839National Science Centre UMO-2019/32/Z/NZ8/00008Slovak Academy of Sciences BiodivERsA3/2018/885/FunProd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land-use intensification is often associated with a decline in functional diversity, potentially undermining the provision of ecosystem services. However, how changes in traits affect ecosystem processes remains poorly understood. Variation in trait values among species in a community may drive ecosystem processes. Alternatively, the mass ratio hypothesis proposes that trait values of the dominant species in a local community are related to ecosystem processes. Using data from 159 farms in six European countries, we quantified the impact of local and landscape-level land-use intensity on ground beetles as pest control agents. We then assessed the extent to which functional diversity and community-weighted mean trait values relate to pest control and cereal yield. In addition, we assessed how the responses to land use and the effects of different species on pest control and yield varied with their traits to compare the relative impact of the traits studied. Functional diversity of ground beetles improved aphid removal, but did not translate into higher crop yields. Pest control of aphids was enhanced by a higher proportion of smaller, mobile ground beetles with a preference for the vegetation layer. Smaller, predatory ground beetles in communities improved crop yield. The magnitude of responses to land-use intensification and the effects on pest control and yield were more strongly influenced by body size than other traits. Our study provides evidence that reduced management intensity can improve pest control by supporting small-sized, macropterous ground beetles. In contrast to the claims of ecological intensification, our joint analysis of the direct effects of land use on yield and indirect effects via functional diversity of ground beetles and pest control suggests that ecosystem services by ground beetles cannot compensate for the yield gap due to a reduction in land-use intensity.

Indexed as

AphidsColeopteraAnimalsBiodiversityCrop ProductionCrops, AgriculturalEuropeFarmsPest Control, Biologicalecological intensificationecosystem serviceslandscape compositionland‐use intensitypest controlpredationtraits

Identifiers

PMID39373261
PMCPMC11610661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.