ReviewThe Journal of infectious diseases2025
Assessing Infectiousness and the Impact of Effective Treatment to Guide Isolation Recommendations for People With Pulmonary Tuberculosis.
Review in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive Value of Semi-Quantitative GeneXpert Categories for Microbiological Outcomes in Pulmonary Tuberculosis.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Community-Based Tuberculosis Isolation Decisions Require Individualization Based on Effectiveness and Duration of Treatment, Community Risks, and Patient Harms.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Determining the extent and duration of infectiousness of people with pulmonary tuberculosis (PWPTB) is critical for various aspects of tuberculosis care, including decisions regarding isolation. Studies suggest considerable heterogeneity in infectiousness of PWPTB. Pretreatment, measures of bacillary burden, including sputum smear microscopy, culture time to positivity, and Xpert MTB/RIF cycle threshold (Ct) value, predict the risk of transmission to contacts. Index patients with smear-negative disease pose lower infectious risk than those who have smear-positive disease, and household contact infection is more likely with index patients who have lower Xpert Ct values. Newer tools that enable detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex from cough aerosol sampling and face mask sampling may be better predictors of contact infection risk. Clinical factors such as cough strength and frequency, and presence of cavitation on chest imaging, may also assist with risk prediction. Posttreatment, smear and culture status are poor predictors of infectiousness. While the exact duration of infectiousness post-treatment initiation remains uncertain, data from human-to-guinea pig transmission studies and clinical studies suggest that effective treatment results in a rapid decline in infectiousness, irrespective of smear or culture conversion. This is largely supported by early bactericidal activity and transcriptomic studies, as well as cough aerosol sampling studies, although a subset of patients may have persistent cough aerosol positivity. These findings can enable a more nuanced approach to isolation decision making while further research studies are awaited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.