Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39373172›Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

The Rehabilitation Landscape in a Low-to-Middle-Income Country: Stakeholder Perspectives and Policy Implications-A Qualitative Study.

Rentia Amelia Maart, Gubela Mji, Linzette Deidré Morris, Dawn Verna Ernstzen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rentia Amelia MaartDivision of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0942-7030
Gubela MjiCentre for Rehabilitation Studies, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa.
Linzette Deidré MorrisDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Health Sector, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Dawn Verna ErnstzenDivision of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need for rehabilitation is increasing on a global level due to a rise in non-communicable diseases, aging and medical advances, and in South Africa (SA), due to the quadruple burden of disease. More information is required regarding rehabilitation scope and practices in SA to optimize the provision of rehabilitation interventions in the context of the transforming health care sector in SA, a low-to-middle-income country (LMIC). The purpose of this study is to explore the perspectives of South African rehabilitation stakeholders on the landscape of rehabilitation in SA. A descriptive qualitative study, with an interpretive approach, was used to explore stakeholder perspectives on rehabilitation practices in the public health care sector of SA. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 rehabilitation stakeholders. Data were analyzed using a combination of deductive and inductive processes to generate themes and categories. We identified 5 main themes, with subsequent categories and sub-categories. The themes include a composite definition of rehabilitation, core elements of rehabilitation provision, challenges affecting rehabilitation practices, the importance of policy implementation, and the progress of rehabilitation in SA. Despite a common understanding of rehabilitation practices in SA amongst stakeholders, many persistent challenges hamper the delivery of effective rehabilitation services. We recommend that further research explore the rehabilitation needs of end-users, together with collaborative research for priority setting on the translation of policy to practice ensuring equitable and quality rehabilitation service delivery.

Indexed as

Health PolicyInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchAdultDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRehabilitationSouth AfricaStakeholder Participationhealth care sectorlandscapelow-to-middle-income countriespolicyrehabilitationSouth Africastakeholders

Identifiers

PMID39373172
PMCPMC11459787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.