ArticleMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy2024
Impacts of
Article in Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Value of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of integrated FDG PET/CT avidity and CT morphologic subtypes in invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical study ofPeerJ · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether Methods: Tumors were divided into 2 groups according to CT appearance: Group 1: nodular-type tumor; group 2: mass- or pneumonic-type tumor. Unilateral and bilateral multifocal diseases were detected. Clinicopathological characteristics and PET/CT findings were compared between IMAs and LPAs, as well as between survivors and non-survivors. Results: We included 43 patients with IMA and 14 with LPA. Tumor size (p=0.003), incidence of mass/pneumonic type (p=0.011), and bilateral lung involvement (p=0.049) were higher in IMAs than in LPAs. IMAs had more advanced T, M, and Tumor, Node, and Metastasis stages than in LPAs (p=0.048, p=0.049, and p=0.022, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in maximum standardized uptake value (SUV Conclusions: Although CT images were useful for the differential diagnosis of LPAs and IMAs, SUV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.