Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39373129›Full record

ReviewHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

Towards a New Integrated Model for Taking Into Account the Experiential Knowledge of People With Chronic Diseases, Integrating Mediation, Therapeutic Education and Partnership: The Expanded Chronic Care Patient-Professional Partnership Model.

Marie-Pascale Pomey, Béatrice Schaad, Aline Lasserre-Moutet, Philip Böhme, Mathieu Jackson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Patient Engagement in Integrated Care: What Matters and Why?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marie-Pascale PomeyResearch Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5180-8139
Béatrice SchaadInstitut des Humanités en Médecine du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4884-2413
Aline Lasserre-MoutetCentre d'éducation thérapeutique du patient, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Genève, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0004-0861-7790
Philip BöhmeDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Nutrition, CHRU Nancy, Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5280-2959
Mathieu JacksonCentre d'excellence sur le partenariat avec les patients et le public, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-3493-6495

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Chronic Care Model (CCM), the Expanded Chronic Care Model (ECCM) and the eHealth Enhanced Chronic Care Model (eCCM) focus on how healthcare teams and eHealth support can offer effective care and relevant solutions for patients facing chronic care conditions. However, they do not consider how patients can help these teams in their work, nor do they promote ways in which patients can help themselves. However, in the last decade, three different models have emerged that can complete our capacity to design and deliver integrated care for people with chronic diseases. In this article, we propose a revised version of the model that integrates the patient perspective and patients' experience-based knowledge. It integrates three different ways of engaging patients that complement the other patient engagement point of view: the experience of care and mediation in healthcare, therapeutic patient education and patient learning pathways, as well as patient-professional partnership. METHODOLOGY: For each of the three models, we conducted a review of the literature using CINAHL, Medline, OVID, EMBASE PsychINFO, Science Direct and government reports on patient engagement and partnership with their healthcare providers, to integrate the different components of these models into the ECCM and eCCM. The goal is to create a model that better takes into account the experiential knowledge of patients and citizens throughout its different dimensions.

resultsWe identified 129 papers based on their framework, design, sample, measures and fit with patient engagement and chronic illness and added our own research when relevant. Integrating the three models provides an opportunity to amplify the role played by the patient perspective in the management of chronic disease. The Expanded Chronic Care Patient-Professional Partnership Model (E2C3PM) is intended to rebalance power relations between healthcare professionals and patients (and their caregivers). This new model is based on recognizing patients' experiential knowledge and their roles as caregivers and as full members of the care team. Integrating patient empowerment into the E2C3PM underscores the importance of coproduction care with patients at the clinical, organizational and system levels within a supportive environment.

conclusionApplying this new model should make it possible to better take into account the complexity of chronic diseases, improving the integration not only of care, services and eHealth support but also the various determinants of health and reaching a mutually beneficial settlement among all actors involved. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A patient-researcher contributed to the development of the protocol, the data collection and the preparation and writing of this manuscript.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationChronic DiseaseDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedHumansPatient Care TeamPatient Education as TopicProfessional-Patient RelationsTelemedicineChronic Care Modelcoproductionintegrated caremediationpatient partnershiptherapeutic patient education

Identifiers

PMID39373129
PMCPMC11456963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.