Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39373033›Full record

SynthesisJournal of advanced nursing2025

What is the State of Organisational Compassion-Based Interventions Targeting to Improve Health Professionals' Well-Being? Results of a Systematic Review.

Camilla Littau Nielsen, Christina Louise Lindhardt, Lui Näslund-Koch, Tove Faber Frandsen, Jane Clemensen, Connie Timmermann

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Camilla Littau NielsenHans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2766-2787
Christina Louise LindhardtDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7476-8210
Lui Näslund-KochCentre for Compassion in Healthcare, Department of Clinical Research, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8278-7518
Tove Faber FrandsenDepartment of Design and Communication, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8983-5009
Jane ClemensenHans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6127-1010
Connie TimmermannDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6791-8348

Funding

Familien Hede Nielsens FondHans Christian Andersen Børne- og UngehospitalKlinisk Institut, Syddansk UniversitetLån & Spar FondLEGO Medarbejdernes Jubilæumslegat 2022Lizzi og Mogens Staal Fonden 2021-0490Odense UniversitetshospitalSimon Spies Fonden
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify and assess the state of knowledge regarding compassion-based interventions and outcomes, targeted to the organisational level, that aim to improve health professionals' well-being.

designSystematic review. DATA SOURCES: Using the PICO model, the clinical question and search strategy were structured. The searches were performed on 20 September 2022 and 26 December 2023 in the Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global databases. Content analysis was applied to analyse data, and the PRISMA and SWiM guidelines were followed for reporting.

resultsThirty-eight studies, mostly from the United Kingdom and the United States, met the inclusion criteria and were quality assessed and analysed. Compassion-based interventions that target the organisational level are quite new, thus representing a burgeoning initiative. In this review, many included quantitative studies revealed significant methodological challenges in effectively measuring organisational compassion (interpersonal relationships, organisational culture and retention/turnover). However, the review findings overall indicate that interpersonal connections between colleagues that foster a sense of community, through shared experiences, mindfulness and (self-)compassion practices and social activities, may be a protective factor for well-being. Further, the review emphasises the crucial role of management support in catalysing organisational changes to improve health professionals' well-being.

conclusionEvidence strongly suggests that fostering human interconnectedness among health professionals is associated with enhanced well-being. Further rigorous studies are needed to validate these findings, clarify the organisational cultural aspects of compassion and develop an effective outcome measurement tool for organisational compassion. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Organisational compassion-based interventions may help foster a culture of compassion within organisations, enhance health professionals' capacity for compassion and benefit both their well-being and the quality of care provided to patients and relatives. PATIENT CONTRIBUTIONS: This review is part of a larger project about compassion and includes two patient representatives (mothers of children with cancer) in the research team.

Indexed as

EmpathyHealth PersonnelOrganizational CultureAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited Kingdomburnoutcarecompassionoccupational healthstaff developmentsystematic reviews and meta‐analyseswork organisation

Identifiers

PMID39373033
PMCPMC11967289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.