SynthesisJournal of radiation research2024
Clinical efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of radiation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of long non-coding RNAs in therapy resistance of cervical cancer and therapeutic potential.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- PRDM1-driven SLC30A9 overexpression contributes to the malignant phenotype of cervical cancer cells via promoting mitochondrial hyperfunction.Cell death & disease · 2025Article
- Anemia and hematocrit decline in cervical cancer: unveiling clinical consequences and management strategies.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Predictive value of hemoglobin, serum PAF, and IL-17 in patients with radiation enteritis complicated with intestinal obstruction and construction and validation of predictive model.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The meta-analysis was to evaluate the therapeutic benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), primarily consisting of platinum-based regimens in conjunction with paclitaxel, when integrated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for individuals afflicted with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). The outcomes were determined by overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), complete response rate (CRR), objective response rate, recurrence rate and adverse events. The assessment of these outcomes was based on the relative risk (RR) accompanied by its 95% confidence interval (CI). Eight articles were included for analysis. LACC patients who underwent treatment with paclitaxel combined with cisplatin (TP)-based NACT in conjunction with CCRT demonstrated improved OS at 2 (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.16, P < 0.001), 3 (RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.23, 1.37, P < 0.001) and 5 years (RR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.32, P < 0.001), as well as PFS at 1 (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.06, P = 0.035), 2 (RR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.40, P = 0.012), 3 (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.34, P < 0.001) and 5 (RR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.25, 1.55, P < 0.001) years, when compared with patients who received CCRT alone. Moreover, the TP-based NACT in conjunction with CCRT achieved a higher CRR and exhibited a lower rate of disease recurrence (RR:1.28, 95% CI:1.08, 1.50, P = 0.003). No significant differences in the risk of adverse effects including anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, radiocystitis and radiation enteritis between the group treated with TP-based NACT combined with CCRT and the group treated with CCRT alone were observed. The combination of TP-based NACT and CCRT demonstrates superior clinical efficacy than CCRT alone. This study may contribute to reducing the burden of LACC by using TP-based NACT plus CCRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.