ArticleSurgical neurology international2024
Optimizing surgical technique in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm - Results from a surgical series with contemporary use of neuronavigation and intraoperative neuromonitoring.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The role of intraoperative neuromonitoring in microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: results from a systematic review of the literature.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Improving Outcomes and Preventing Complications in Cranial Base Surgery.Brain sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Microvascular decompression (MVD) through a retrosigmoid approach is considered the treatment of choice in cases of hemifacial spasm (HFS) due to neurovascular conflict (NVC). Despite the widespread of neuronavigation and intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) techniques in neurosurgery, their contemporary application in MVD for HFS has been only anecdotally reported. Methods: Here, we report the results of MVD performed with a combination of neuronavigation and IONM, including lateral spread response (LSR) in 20 HFS patients. HFS clinical outcome and different surgical-related factors, such as craniotomy size, surgical duration, mastoid air cell (MAC) opening, postoperative cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) leakage, sinus injury, and other complications occurrence, and the length of hospitalization (LOS) were studied. Results: Postoperatively, residual spasm persisted only in two patients, but at the latest follow-up (FU) (mean: 12.5 ± 8.98 months), all patients had resolution of symptoms. The mean surgical duration was 103.35 ± 19.36 min, and the mean LOS was 2.21 ± 1.12 days. Craniotomy resulted in 4.21 ± 1.21 cm Conclusion: MVD for HFS is an elective procedure, and for this reason, surgery should integrate all technologies to ensure safety and efficacy. The disappearance of LSR is a crucial factor for identifying the vessel responsible for NVC and for achieving long-term resolution of HFS symptoms. Simultaneously, the benefits of using neuronavigation, including the ability to customize the craniotomy, contribute to reduce the possibility of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.