Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39372908›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational social science2024

Fast meta-analytic approximations for relational event models: applications to data streams and multilevel data.

Fabio Vieira, Roger Leenders, Joris Mulder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational social science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fabio VieiraDepartment Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4253-1953
Roger LeendersDepartment of Organization Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Joris MulderDepartment Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large relational-event history data stemming from large networks are becoming increasingly available due to recent technological developments (e.g. digital communication, online databases, etc). This opens many new doors to learn about complex interaction behavior between actors in temporal social networks. The relational event model has become the gold standard for relational event history analysis. Currently, however, the main bottleneck to fit relational events models is of computational nature in the form of memory storage limitations and computational complexity. Relational event models are therefore mainly used for relatively small data sets while larger, more interesting datasets, including multilevel data structures and relational event data streams, cannot be analyzed on standard desktop computers. This paper addresses this problem by developing approximation algorithms based on meta-analysis methods that can fit relational event models significantly faster while avoiding the computational issues. In particular, meta-analytic approximations are proposed for analyzing streams of relational event data, multilevel relational event data and potentially combinations thereof. The accuracy and the statistical properties of the methods are assessed using numerical simulations. Furthermore, real-world data are used to illustrate the potential of the methodology to study social interaction behavior in an organizational network and interaction behavior among political actors. The algorithms are implemented in the publicly available R package 'remx'.

Indexed as

Bayesian inferenceData streamsMeta-analysisMultilevel analysisRelational event historySocial networks

Identifiers

PMID39372908
PMCPMC11452451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.