Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39372875›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2024

Using Machine Learning and Electronic Health Records to Identify Neuropsychiatric Risk Scores for Delirium in ICU and General Hospital Settings.

Mariam Heikal, Halim Saad, Pia Maria Ghanime, Tarek Bou Dargham, Maya Bizri, Firas Kobeissy, Wassim El Hajj, Farid Talih

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mariam HeikalDepartment of Computer Science, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0002-9039-5602
Halim SaadDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID 0009-0000-0740-8939
Pia Maria GhanimeDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Tarek Bou DarghamDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8126-9559
Maya BizriDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0350-6157
Firas KobeissyDepartment of Neurobiology, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Wassim El HajjDepartment of Computer Science, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Farid TalihDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0001-7147-7701

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Delirium is a common and acute neuropsychiatric syndrome that requires timely intervention to prevent its associated morbidity and mortality. Yet, its diagnosis and symptoms are often overlooked due to its variable clinical presentation and fluctuating nature. Thus, in this study, we address the barriers to delirium diagnosis by utilizing a machine learning-based predictive algorithm for incident delirium that relies on archived electronic health records (EHRs) data. Methods: We used the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) database to create a detailed dataset for identifying delirium in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Our approach involved training machine learning models on this dataset to pinpoint critical clinical features for delirium detection. These features were then refined and applied to non-ICU patients using EHRs from the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC). Results: Our study assessed machine learning models like Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), Classification and Regression Trees (CART), Random Forest (RF), Neural Oblivious Decision Ensembles (NODE), and Logistic Regression (LR), highlighting superior delirium detection in diverse clinical settings. The CatBoost model excelled in ICU environments with an F1 Score of 89.2%, while XGBoost performed best in general hospital settings with a 75.4% F1 Score. Interpretations using Tabular Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) revealed critical indicators such as prothrombin time and hematocrit levels, enhancing model transparency and clinical applicability. These clinical insights help differentiate the delirium predictors between ICU patients, who are often sensitive to various factors. Conclusion: The proposed predictive algorithm improves delirium detection rates and streamlines efficiency in hospital electronic systems, thereby enabling prompt interventions to prevent delirium progression and associated complications. The clinical indicators for delirium that we identified in general hospital settings and ICU can greatly help healthcare professionals identify potential causes of delirium and reduce misdiagnosis.

Indexed as

clinical indicatorsDeliriumelectronic health recordsHospital-acquired deliriumICU deliriummachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39372875
PMCPMC11456270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.