ArticleWellcome open research2024
Mortality, morbidity and educational outcomes in children of consanguineous parents in the Born in Bradford cohort.
Article in Wellcome open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Consanguineous Marriage: Law and Public Health.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025Article
- An exploratory machine learning study on paediatric abdominal pain phenotyping and prediction.PloS one · 2025Article
- Changes in prevalence and patterns of consanguinity in Bradford, UK - evidence from two cohort studies.Wellcome open research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Children of consanguineous parents have a higher risk of infant and childhood mortality, morbidity and intellectual and developmental disability. Methods: Using a UK based longitudinal cohort study we quantify differences according to the consanguinity status of children from birth to 10 in mortality, health care usage, two health and three educational outcomes. The cohort comprises 13727 children; 35.7% White British, 43.7% Pakistani heritage, and 20.8% are from other ethnic groups. Results: Compared to children whose parents were not related children whose parents were first cousins were more likely to die by age 10 (odds ratio 2.81, 95% CI 1.82-4.35) to have higher rates of primary care appointments (incident rate ratio 1.39, 95% CI 1.34-1.45) and more prescriptions (incident rate ratio 1.61, 95% CI 1.50-1.73). Rates of hospital accident and emergency attendance (incident rate ratio 1.21,95% CI 1.12-1.30) and hospital outpatients' appointments (incident rate ratio 2.21,95% CI 1.90-2.56) are higher. Children of first cousins have higher rates of speech/ language development difficulties (odds ratio 1.63, 95% CI 1.36-1.96) and learning difficulties (odds ratio 1.89, 95% CI 1.28-2.81). When they begin school they are less likely to reach phonics standards (odds ratio 0.73, 95% CI 0.63-0.84) and less likely to show a good level of development (odds ratio 0.61, 95% CI 0.54-0.68). At age 10 there are higher numbers with special educational needs from first cousin unions compared to all children whose parents are not blood relations (odds ratio 1.38, 95% CI 1.20-1.58). Effect sizes for consanguinity status are similar in univariable and multivariable models where a range of control variables are added. Conclusions: There is higher childhood mortality and greater use of health care as well as higher rates of learning difficulties, speech and language development challenges and substantive differences in education outcomes in children whose parents are first cousins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.