Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39372816›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Brain tumor grade classification using the ConvNext architecture.

Yasar Mehmood, Usama Ijaz Bajwa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yasar MehmoodDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2891-9129
Usama Ijaz BajwaDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5755-1194

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Brain tumor grade is an important aspect of brain tumor diagnosis and helps to plan for treatment. Traditional methods of diagnosis, including biopsy and manual examination of medical images, are either invasive or may result in inaccurate diagnoses. This study proposes a brain tumor grade classification technique using a modern convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture called ConvNext that inputs magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. Methods: Deep learning-based techniques are replacing invasive procedures for consistent, accurate, and non-invasive diagnosis of brain tumors. A well-known challenge of using deep learning architectures in medical imaging is data scarcity. Modern-day architectures have huge trainable parameters and require massive datasets to achieve the desired accuracy and avoid overfitting. Therefore, transfer learning is popular among researchers using medical imaging data. Recently, transformer-based architectures have surpassed CNNs for image data. However, recently proposed CNNs have achieved superior accuracy by introducing some tweaks inspired by vision transformers. This study proposed a technique to extract features from the ConvNext architecture and feed these features to a fully connected neural network for final classification. Results: The proposed study achieved state-of-the-art performance on the BraTS 2019 dataset using pre-trained ConvNext. The best accuracy of 99.5% was achieved when three MRI sequences were input as three channels of the pre-trained CNN. Conclusion: The study demonstrated the efficacy of the representations learned by a modern CNN architecture, which has a higher inductive bias for the image data than vision transformers for brain tumor grade classification.

Indexed as

brain tumor gradeConvNextconvolutional neural networkstransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID39372816
PMCPMC11452878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.