ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Determinants of infarct progression and perfusion core growth in transferred LVO patients from remote regions.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perfusion stability in acute stroke: An observational study exploiting repeated CTP imaging.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- Early Post-Thrombectomy MRI Markers: Temporal Evolution and Association With Reperfusion and Clinical Outcome.Neurology · 2025Article
- Direct-to-Angio Without Any Repeat Neuroimaging for Planned Endovascular Therapy in Patients Transferred From Remote Primary Stroke Centers: A Propensity-Matched Study.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Repeat imaging when regional and remote stroke patients arrive at a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) can delay endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). We examined which clinical and imaging parameters predict infarct progression and perfusion core growth during transport. Methods: We included patients recruited from 2017 to 2023 in a prospective database who were transferred from remote sites with large vessel occlusion, had CT perfusion imaging at the primary stroke center (PSC), and had repeat CT on arrival at the CSC demonstrating persistent occlusion. The key imaging characteristics were perfusion core change (rCBF < 30%) and ASPECTS change. Multiple and ordinal logistic regression analyses were used to assess the relationship between background clinical and imaging variables and the CT-perfusion core and ASPECTS on arrival. DEFUSE 3 criteria (ASPECTS ≥ 6, perfusion core < 70 mL) were used to define "favorable imaging." Results: In 90 patients with CT perfusion at both PSC and CSC and persistent occlusion, the median time from onset to PSC presentation was 279 min (IQR 143-702). The median time from PSC presentation to CSC arrival was 243.5 min (IQR 186-335), and the median distance traveled was 186.5 km (IQR 101-258). Lower baseline ASPECTS (per point) was associated with a 7 mL increase (95%CI 2-11 mL) in perfusion core between scans ( Conclusion: Perfusion core growth during transport was uncommon and most strongly associated with lower ASPECTS at the PSC. Initially, favorable PSC imaging May predict whether repeat imaging is necessary at the CSC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.