Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39372700›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

Determinants of infarct progression and perfusion core growth in transferred LVO patients from remote regions.

Michael Valente, Andrew Bivard, Bernard Yan, Stephen M Davis, Bruce C V Campbell, Peter J Mitchell, Henry Ma, Mark W Parsons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael ValenteDepartment of Medicine and Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Andrew BivardDepartment of Medicine and Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Bernard YanDepartment of Medicine and Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Stephen M DavisDepartment of Medicine and Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Bruce C V CampbellDepartment of Medicine and Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Peter J MitchellDepartment of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Henry MaDepartment of Neurology, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Mark W ParsonsDepartment of Neurology, South Western Sydney Clinical School, Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool Hospital, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Repeat imaging when regional and remote stroke patients arrive at a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) can delay endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). We examined which clinical and imaging parameters predict infarct progression and perfusion core growth during transport. Methods: We included patients recruited from 2017 to 2023 in a prospective database who were transferred from remote sites with large vessel occlusion, had CT perfusion imaging at the primary stroke center (PSC), and had repeat CT on arrival at the CSC demonstrating persistent occlusion. The key imaging characteristics were perfusion core change (rCBF < 30%) and ASPECTS change. Multiple and ordinal logistic regression analyses were used to assess the relationship between background clinical and imaging variables and the CT-perfusion core and ASPECTS on arrival. DEFUSE 3 criteria (ASPECTS ≥ 6, perfusion core < 70 mL) were used to define "favorable imaging." Results: In 90 patients with CT perfusion at both PSC and CSC and persistent occlusion, the median time from onset to PSC presentation was 279 min (IQR 143-702). The median time from PSC presentation to CSC arrival was 243.5 min (IQR 186-335), and the median distance traveled was 186.5 km (IQR 101-258). Lower baseline ASPECTS (per point) was associated with a 7 mL increase (95%CI 2-11 mL) in perfusion core between scans ( Conclusion: Perfusion core growth during transport was uncommon and most strongly associated with lower ASPECTS at the PSC. Initially, favorable PSC imaging May predict whether repeat imaging is necessary at the CSC.

Indexed as

collateral flowcollateral flow indexCT perfusioninfarct progressionischemic stroke

Identifiers

PMID39372700
PMCPMC11449691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.