ArticleInternational journal of women's health2024
Analysis of Fetal Growth and Pregnancy Outcome in Pregnant Women Infected with Novel Coronavirus in Mid-Pregnancy.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate whether fetal prenatal ultrasound, fetal growth rate, and pregnancy outcome statistically differ between women infected with novel coronavirus (COVID-19) in mid-pregnancy and an uninfected control group. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis of biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), femur length (FL), and z-scores for each among 46 pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 in mid-pregnancy between December 01, 2022 and June 31, 2023 was conducted. A control group included 92 pregnant women negative for COVID-19 during the same period and was also analyzed. To examine fetal growth, rate of increase in BPD, HC, AC, FL, and estimated fetal weight (EFW) between second and third trimester scans were analyzed. In addition, pregnancy outcome, maternal comorbidities, and neonatal prognosis were assessed. Results: The occurrence of gestational diabetes differed significantly between groups, but the fetal growth rate and EFW did not. Similarly, pregnancy outcomes and neonatal prognoses did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion: Gestational diabetes was a complication that differed between patients with and without COVID-19 in this study. COVID-19 in pregnant women did not affect fetal development. Therefore, these preliminary data suggest that increased fetal monitoring is not necessary for women infected with COVID-19 during the second trimester, and these women should be reassured of the low risk of adverse fetal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.