Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39372605›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteins and proteomics2024

Interrogating data-independent acquisition LC-MS/MS for affinity proteomics.

David L Tabb, Mohammed Hanzala Kaniyar, Omar G Rosas Bringas, Heaji Shin, Luciano Di Stefano, Martin S Taylor, Shaoshuai Xie, Omer H Yilmaz, John LaCava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteins and proteomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Susceptibility of mice to primaryFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David L TabbEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Mohammed Hanzala KaniyarEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Omar G Rosas BringasEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Heaji ShinDepartment of Biology, David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT, MIT, Cambridge, MA USA.
Luciano Di StefanoEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Martin S TaylorDepartment of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA.
Shaoshuai XieEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Omer H YilmazDepartment of Biology, David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT, MIT, Cambridge, MA USA.
John LaCavaEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Defining molecular contributions of LINE-1 retrotransposons to AD / ADRDR01AG078925 · NIA · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI John LaCava, John M Sedivy · 2022 to 2026
$3.7M
The lysosomal fasting response in intestinal stem cells and cancerR01DK140310 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Omer Yilmaz · 2024 to 2026
$2.4M
Elucidating structural, mechanistic, and allosteric determinants of mTOR Complex 2 (mTORC2) signaling.K08DK129824 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TAYLOR, MARTIN S · 2021 to 2025
$853k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG078925NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK129824NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK140310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data-Independent Acquisition (DIA) LC-MS/MS is an attractive partner for co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) and affinity proteomics in general. Reducing the variability of quantitation by DIA could increase the statistical contrast for detecting specific interactors versus what has been achieved in Data-Dependent Acquisition (DDA). By interrogating affinity proteomes featuring both DDA and DIA experiments, we sought to evaluate the spectral libraries, the missingness of protein quantity tables, and the CV of protein quantities in six studies representing three different instrument manufacturers. We examined four contemporary bioinformatics workflows for DIA: FragPipe, DIA-NN, Spectronaut, and MaxQuant. We determined that (1) identifying spectral libraries directly from DIA experiments works well enough that separate DDA experiments do not produce larger spectral libraries when given equivalent instrument time; (2) experiments involving mock pull-downs or IgG controls may feature such indistinct signals that contemporary software will struggle to quantify them; (3) measured CV values were well controlled by Spectronaut and DIA-NN (and FragPipe, which implements DIA-NN for the quantitation step); and (4) when FragPipe builds spectral libraries and quantifies proteins from DIA experiments rather than performing both operations in DDA experiments, the DIA route results in a larger number of proteins quantified without missing values as well as lower CV for measured protein quantities. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42485-024-00166-4.

Indexed as

Affinity enrichmentBioinformaticsCo-immunoprecipitationData-independent acquisitionLabel-free quantitation

Identifiers

PMID39372605
PMCPMC11452513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.