ArticleJBMR plus2024
Osteoclast indices in osteogenesis imperfecta: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in JBMR plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dose matters: haploinsufficiency in osteogenesis imperfecta.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2026Review
- New lens on congenital mild bone fragility: a novel Col1a1 knockout mouse model for osteogenesis imperfecta type 1.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026Article
- Cell signaling and transcriptional regulation of osteoclast lineage commitment, differentiation, bone resorption and diseases.Cell discovery · 2026Review
- Anti-transforming growth factor-β treatment shows increased bone mass and strength in a novel mouse model for osteogenesis imperfecta type I.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025Article
- Special Collection on Rare Musculoskeletal Diseases 2024.JBMR plus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare bone fragility disorder caused by mutations in genes encoding collagen type I or that affect its processing. Alterations in osteoclasts were suggested to contribute to OI pathophysiology. We aimed to systematically identify studies reporting measures of osteoclast formation and function in patients and mouse models of OI, to quantify OI-induced changes. The systematic search of Medline, Ovid, and Web of Science identified 798 unique studies. After screening, we included 23 studies for meta-analysis, reporting osteoclast parameters in 310 patients with OI of 9 different types and 16 studies reporting osteoclast parameters in 406 animals of 11 different OI mouse models. The standardized mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as the effect size, and random-effects meta-analysis was performed. In patients with OI, collagen degradation markers were significantly higher compared with age-matched controls, with an effect size of 1.23 (CI: 0.36, 2.10]. Collagen degradation markers were the most elevated in the 3- to 7-year-old age group and in patients with more severe forms of OI. Bone histomorphometry demonstrated the trends for higher osteoclast numbers (1.16; CI: -0.22, 2.55) and osteoclast surface (0.43; CI: -0.63, 1.49), and significantly higher eroded surface (3.24; CI: 0.51, 5.96) compared with age-matched controls. In OI mice, meta-analysis demonstrated significant increases in collagen degradation markers (1.59; CI: 1.07, 2.11), in osteoclast numbers (0.94; CI: 0.50, 1.39), osteoclast surface (0.73; CI: 0.22, 1.23), and eroded surface (1.31; CI: 0.54, 2.08). The largest differences were in OI mice with the mutations in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.