ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2024
Volumetric change of calcium silicate-based repair materials in a simulated inflammatory environment: A micro-computed tomography study.
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sample size calculation practices in original research articles of the Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics (2021-2025).Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Physical and surface analysis of calcium silicate Clinker after acid challenge: a micro-CT and SEM study.Brazilian oral research · 2026Article
- Impact of acidic pH and sealer thickness on the physical behavior of endodontic sealers: a micro-CT study.Brazilian oral research · 2026Article
- Coronal microleakage of two intraorifice bioceramic barriers in single-rooted premolars:Dental research journal · 2026Article
- Apical Surgery of a Maxillary Left Central Tooth Using NeoPutty After Retreatment Failure: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Management of Immature Permanent Mandibular First Molar Using NeoPutty: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of mineral trioxide aggregate with and without silver nanoparticles: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Review
- Article
- Bioceramics in Endodontics: Limitations and Future Innovations-A Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: An acidic hydrogen potential (pH) in an inflammatory condition in the periapical tissues may affect the properties of repair bioceramic cement. Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pH on the volumetric change of the ready-to-use bioceramic NeoPUTTY (NP) compared to the powder/liquid MTA Repair HP (MTAHP) after immersion in butyric acid (BA, pH 4.1) or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.35). Subjects and Methods: Dentin tubes filled with NP or MTAHP were scanned in micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) after 24 h. Then, the specimens were immersed in 1.5 mL of BA: NP/BA, MTAHP/BA or PBS: NP/PBS, MTAHP/PBS. After 7 days, new micro-CT scans were performed. The percentage of volumetric change (extremities and internal part) of the materials was assessed. Statistical Analysis Used: ANOVA/Tukey and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed (α =0.05). Results: All materials showed a volumetric decrease after immersion in BA or PBS at the extremities in contact with the solutions. MTAHP/BA showed the highest volumetric loss. There was no difference in the volumetric change when the internal part of the materials was evaluated. Conclusions: An acid pH negatively affects the volumetric stability of MTAHP. Low values of volumetric change were demonstrated for NP in both immersion environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.