ArticleJACC. Advances2024
Improving Cardiovascular Disease Prediction With Machine Learning Using Mental Health Data: A Prospective UK Biobank Study.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: An Umbrella Review of Applications and Translational Challenges.Vascular health and risk management · 2026Pooled it
- Integrating education-based interventions and machine learning for stunting prevention: A case study in East Lombok, Indonesia.Dialogues in health · 2026Article
- Identification of cardiovascular disease in patients with kidney stone disease using explainable machine learning.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence and Electrocardiography for Cardiovascular Disease Diagnosis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Generative artificial intelligence in predictive analysis of diabetes and its complications: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Integrating Large-Scale Data Analytics for Cardiovascular Disease Prediction: A Scoping Review.Healthcare informatics research · 2025Article
- How to measure and model cardiovascular aging.Cardiovascular research · 2025Review
- Integrating Food Preference Profiling, Behavior Change Strategies, and Machine Learning for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in a Personalized Nutrition Digital Health Intervention: Conceptual Pipeline Development and Proof-of-Principle Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Unlocking the link: predicting cardiovascular disease risk with a focus on airflow obstruction using machine learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Advancing Cardiovascular Disease Prediction Machine Learning Models With Psychological Factors.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- AI in Cardiology: Improving Outcomes for All.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Robust and accurate prediction of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk facilitates early intervention to benefit patients. The intricate relationship between mental health disorders and CVD is widely recognized. However, existing models often overlook psychological factors, relying on a limited set of clinical and lifestyle parameters, or being developed on restricted population subsets. Objectives: This study aims to assess the impact of integrating psychological data into a novel machine learning (ML) approach on enhancing CVD prediction performance. Methods: Using a comprehensive UK Biobank data set (n = 375,145), the correlation between CVD and traditional and psychological risk factors was examined. CVD included hypertensive disease, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and arrhythmias. An ensemble ML model containing 5 constituent algorithms (decision tree, random forest, XGBoost, support vector machine, and deep neural network) was tested for its ability to predict CVD based on 2 training data sets: using traditional CVD risk factors alone, or using a combination of traditional and psychological risk factors. Results: A total of 375,145 subjects with normal health status and with CVD were included. The ensemble ML model could predict CVD with 71.31% accuracy using traditional CVD risk factors alone. However, by adding psychological factors to the training data, accuracy increased to 85.13%. The accuracy and robustness of the ensemble ML model outperformed all 5 constituent learning algorithms. Conclusions: Incorporating mental health assessment data within an ensemble ML model results in a significantly improved, highly accurate, CVD prediction model, outperforming traditional risk factor prediction alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.