Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39372477›Full record

ArticleJACC. Advances2024

Improving Cardiovascular Disease Prediction With Machine Learning Using Mental Health Data: A Prospective UK Biobank Study.

Mohsen Dorraki, Zhibin Liao, Derek Abbott, Peter J Psaltis, Emma Baker, Niranjan Bidargaddi, Hannah R Wardill, Anton van den Hengel, Jagat Narula, Johan W Verjans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. How to measure and model cardiovascular aging.Cardiovascular research · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohsen DorrakiSchool of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Australian Institute for Machine Learning (AIML), Adelaide, Australia; Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia.
Zhibin LiaoAustralian Institute for Machine Learning (AIML), Adelaide, Australia.
Derek AbbottSchool of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Peter J PsaltisLifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia.
Emma BakerAustralian Institute for Machine Learning (AIML), Adelaide, Australia.
Niranjan BidargaddiCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Hannah R WardillPrecision Cancer Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia; School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Anton van den HengelAustralian Institute for Machine Learning (AIML), Adelaide, Australia.
Jagat NarulaUniversity of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, USA.
Johan W VerjansAustralian Institute for Machine Learning (AIML), Adelaide, Australia; Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia. Electronic address: johan.verjans@sahmri.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Robust and accurate prediction of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk facilitates early intervention to benefit patients. The intricate relationship between mental health disorders and CVD is widely recognized. However, existing models often overlook psychological factors, relying on a limited set of clinical and lifestyle parameters, or being developed on restricted population subsets. Objectives: This study aims to assess the impact of integrating psychological data into a novel machine learning (ML) approach on enhancing CVD prediction performance. Methods: Using a comprehensive UK Biobank data set (n = 375,145), the correlation between CVD and traditional and psychological risk factors was examined. CVD included hypertensive disease, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and arrhythmias. An ensemble ML model containing 5 constituent algorithms (decision tree, random forest, XGBoost, support vector machine, and deep neural network) was tested for its ability to predict CVD based on 2 training data sets: using traditional CVD risk factors alone, or using a combination of traditional and psychological risk factors. Results: A total of 375,145 subjects with normal health status and with CVD were included. The ensemble ML model could predict CVD with 71.31% accuracy using traditional CVD risk factors alone. However, by adding psychological factors to the training data, accuracy increased to 85.13%. The accuracy and robustness of the ensemble ML model outperformed all 5 constituent learning algorithms. Conclusions: Incorporating mental health assessment data within an ensemble ML model results in a significantly improved, highly accurate, CVD prediction model, outperforming traditional risk factor prediction alone.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecardiovascular diseasecardiovascular predictionmachine learningmental health

Identifiers

PMID39372477
PMCPMC11450915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.