ArticleJACC. Advances2024
Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Electrocardiography Identifies Patients With Normal Ejection Fraction at Risk of Worse Outcomes.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning Applied to 12-Lead ECGs for Detection of Structural, Metabolic and Systemic Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Tests for Stage B Heart Failure.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- An ECG foundation model for generalizable cardiac function prediction across the lifespan.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Expertly used unsupervised clustering provides clinical tools as well as insight.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Editorial: Novel translational advances in artificial intelligence for diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- AI in Cardiology: Improving Outcomes for All.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: An artificial intelligence (AI)-based electrocardiogram (ECG) model identifies patients with a higher likelihood of low ejection fraction (EF). Patients with an abnormal AI-ECG score but normal EF (false positives; FP) more often developed future low EF. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate echocardiographic characteristics and all-cause mortality risk in FP patients. Methods: Patients with transthoracic echocardiography and ECG were classified retrospectively into FP, true negatives (TN) (EF ≥50%, normal AI-ECG), true positives (TP) (EF <50%, abnormal AI-ECG), or false negatives (FN) (EF <50%, normal AI-ECG). Echocardiographic abnormalities included systolic and diastolic left ventricular function, valve disease, estimated pulmonary pressures, and right heart parameters. Cox regression was used to assess factors associated with all-cause mortality. Results: Of 100,586 patients (median age 63 years; 45.5% females), 79% were TN, 7% FP, 5% FN, and 8% TP. FPs had more echocardiographic abnormalities than TN but less than FN or TP patients. An echocardiographic abnormality was present in 97% of FPs. Over median 2.7 years, FPs had increased mortality risk (age and sex-adjusted HR: 1.64 [95% CI: 1.55-1.73]) vs TN. Age and sex-adjusted mortality was higher in FP with abnormal echocardiography than FP with normal echocardiography and to TN regardless of echocardiography result; FP with normal echocardiography had comparable mortality risk to TN with abnormal echocardiography. Conclusions: FP patients were more likely than TNs to have echocardiographic abnormalities with 97% of exams showing an abnormality. FP patients had higher mortality rates, especially when their echocardiograms also had an abnormality; the concomitant use of AI ECG and echocardiography helps in stratifying risk in patients with normal LVEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.