ArticleJACC. Advances2024
Mortality Risk Stratification Utilizing Artificial Intelligence Electrocardiogram for Hyperkalemia in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-enabled electrocardiogram alert for potassium imbalance treatment: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Serial Electrocardiograms for Prediction of All-Cause Mortality in Secondary Care Settings.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- New Insights into Cardiac Intensive Care.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Key Concepts in Machine Learning and Clinical Applications in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Electrocardiographic Risk Stratification in Critically Ill Cardiac Patients: Can Deep Learning Fulfill its Promise?JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- AI in Cardiology: Improving Outcomes for All.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hyperkalemia has been associated with increased mortality in cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients. An artificial intelligence (AI) enhanced electrocardiogram (ECG) can predict hyperkalemia, and other AI-ECG algorithms have demonstrated mortality risk-stratification in CICU patients. Objectives: The authors hypothesized that the AI-ECG hyperkalemia algorithm could stratify mortality risk beyond laboratory serum potassium measurement alone. Methods: We included 11,234 unique Mayo Clinic CICU patients admitted from 2007 to 2018 with a 12-lead ECG and blood potassium (K) level obtained at admission with K ≥5 mEq/L defining hyperkalemia. ECGs underwent AI evaluation for the probability of hyperkalemia (probability >0.5 defined as positive). Hospital mortality was analyzed using logistic regression, and survival to 1 year was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox analysis. Results: In the final cohort (n = 11,234), the mean age was 69.6 ± 10.5 years, 37.8% were females, and 92.4% were White. Chronic kidney disease was present in 20.2%. The mean laboratory potassium value for the cohort was 4.2 ± 0.3 mEq/L. The AI-ECG predicted hyperkalemia in 33.9% (n = 3,810) of CICU patients and 12.9% (n = 1,451) of patients had laboratory-confirmed hyperkalemia (K ≥5 mEq/L). In-hospital mortality increased in false-positive, false-negative, and true-positive patients, respectively ( Conclusions: AI-ECG-based prediction of hyperkalemia, even with a normal laboratory potassium value, was associated with higher in-hospital mortality and lower 1-year survival in CICU patients. This study demonstrated that AI-ECG probability of hyperkalemia may enable rapid individualized risk stratification in critically ill patients beyond laboratory value alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.