Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39372465›Full record

ArticleJACC. Advances2024

Machine-Learning for Phenotyping and Prognostication of Myocardial Infarction and Injury in Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Ehsan Khan, Kristina Lambrakis, Zhibin Liao, Joey Gerlach, Tom Briffa, Louise Cullen, Adam J Nelson, Johan Verjans, Derek P Chew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ehsan KhanCollege of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia.
Kristina LambrakisCollege of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia.
Zhibin LiaoAustralian Institute of Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Joey GerlachCollege of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Tom BriffaSchool of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Louise CullenEmergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; School of Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Adam J NelsonDepartment of Cardiology, Victorian Heart Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Johan VerjansAustralian Institute of Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Derek P ChewCollege of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Heart and Vascular Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia; Monash Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Victorian Heart Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: Derek.Chew@monash.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clinical work-up for suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is resource intensive. Objectives: This study aimed to develop a machine learning model for digitally phenotyping myocardial injury and infarction and predict 30-day events in suspected ACS patients. Methods: Training and testing data sets, predominantly derived from electronic health records, included suspected ACS patients presenting to 6 and 26 South Australian hospitals, respectively. All index presentations and 30-day death and myocardial infarction (MI) were adjudicated using the Fourth Universal Definition of MI. We developed 2 diagnostic prediction models which phenotype myocardial injury and infarction according to the Fourth UDMI (chronic myocardial injury vs acute myocardial injury patterns, the latter further differentiated into acute non-ischaemic myocardial injury, Types 1 and 2 MI) using eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) and deep-learning (DL). We also developed an event prediction model for risk prediction of 30-day death or MI using XGB. Analyses were performed in Python 3.6. Results: The training and testing data sets had 6,722 and 8,869 participants, respectively. The diagnostic prediction XGB and deep learning models achieved an area under the curve of 99.2% ± 0.1% and 98.8% ± 0.2%, respectively, for differentiating an acute myocardial injury Conclusions: Machine learning models can digitally phenotype suspected ACS patients at index presentation and predict subsequent events within 30 days. These models require external validation in a randomized clinical trial to evaluate their impact in clinical practice.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learningmyocardial infarctionmyocardial injurytroponin

Identifiers

PMID39372465
PMCPMC11450946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.