ArticleJACC. Advances2024
Automated Assessment of Right Atrial Pressure From Ultrasound Videos Using Machine Learning.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current State of Artificial Intelligence in Assessing Cardiac Function.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- AI in Cardiology: Improving Outcomes for All.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Early recognition of volume overload is essential for heart failure patients. Volume overload can often be easily treated if caught early but causes significant morbidity if unrecognized and allowed to progress. Intravascular volume status can be assessed by ultrasound-based estimation of right atrial pressure (RAP), but the availability of this diagnostic modality is limited by the need for experienced physicians to accurately interpret these scans. Objectives: We sought to evaluate whether machine learning can accurately estimate echocardiogram-measured RAP. Methods: We developed fully automated deep learning models for identifying inferior vena cava scans with rapid inspiration in echocardiogram studies and estimating RAP from those scans. The RAP estimation model was trained and evaluated using 15,828 ultrasound videos of the inferior vena cava and coupled cardiologist-assessed RAP estimates as well as 319 RAP measurements from right heart catheterization. Results: Our model agreed with cardiologist estimates 80.3% of the time (area under the receiver-operating characteristic of 0.844) in a test data set, at the upper end of interoperator agreement rates found in the literature of 70 to 75%. Our model's RAP estimates were statistically indistinguishable from cardiologists' ultrasound-based RAP estimates ( Conclusions: Machine learning is capable of accurately and robustly interpreting RAP from echocardiogram videos. This algorithm could be used to perform automated assessments of intravascular volume status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.