Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39372456›Full record

ArticleJACC. Advances2024

Coronary Artery Stenosis and High-Risk Plaque Assessed With an Unsupervised Fully Automated Deep Learning Technique.

Abdul Rahman Ihdayhid, Amro Sehly, Albert He, Jack Joyner, Julien Flack, John Konstantopoulos, David E Newby, Michelle C Williams, Brian S Ko, Benjamin J W Chow and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. CAD-RADS: A Standardized Reporting System for Coronary CT Angiography.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Abdul Rahman IhdayhidFiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia; Artrya Ltd, Perth, Australia; Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, Australia; Curtin University, Perth, Australia. Electronic address: abdul.ihdayhid@perkins.org.au.
Amro SehlyFiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Albert HeFiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Jack JoynerArtrya Ltd, Perth, Australia.
Julien FlackArtrya Ltd, Perth, Australia.
John KonstantopoulosArtrya Ltd, Perth, Australia.
David E NewbyThe University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Michelle C WilliamsThe University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Brian S KoMonash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Benjamin J W ChowUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Girish DwivediFiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia; Artrya Ltd, Perth, Australia; Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, Australia; University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. Electronic address: girish.dwivedi@perkins.uwa.edu.au.

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/09/002/26360British Heart Foundation FS/ICRF/20/26002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has emerged as a reliable noninvasive modality to assess coronary artery stenosis and high-risk plaque (HRP). However, CCTA assessment of stenosis and HRP is time-consuming and requires specialized training, limiting its clinical translation. Objectives: The aim of this study is to develop and validate a fully automated deep learning system capable of characterizing stenosis severity and HRP on CCTA. Methods: A deep learning system was trained to assess stenosis and HRP on CCTA scans from 570 patients in multiple centers. Stenosis severity was categorized as >0%, 1 to 49%, ≥50%, and ≥70%. HRP was defined as low attenuation plaque (≤30 HU), positive remodeling (≥10% diameter), and spotty calcification (<3 mm). The model was then tested on 769 patients (3,012 vessels) for stenosis severity and 45 patients (325 vessels) for HRP. Results: Our deep learning system achieved 93.5% per-vessel agreement within 1 Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) category for stenosis. Diagnostic performance for per-vessel stenosis was very good for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve with: >0% stenosis: 90.6%, 88.8%, 83.4%, 93.9%, 89.7%, respectively; ≥50% stenosis: 87.1%, 92.3%, 60.9%, 98.1%, 89.7%, respectively. Similarly, the per-vessel HRP feature achieved very good diagnostic performance with an area under the curve of 0.80, 0.79, and 0.77 for low attenuation plaque, spotty calcification, and positive remodeling, respectively. Conclusions: A fully automated unsupervised deep learning system can rapidly evaluate stenosis severity and characterize HRP with very good diagnostic performance on CCTA.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecardiac computed tomographycoronary artery diseasedeep learning

Identifiers

PMID39372456
PMCPMC11450949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.