Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39372341›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2024

An

Saleh A Shams, Sridhar Nekkanti, Shruti Shetty

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saleh A ShamsDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences (MCODS), Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Sridhar NekkantiDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences (MCODS), Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Shruti ShettyDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences (MCODS), Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim and background: The aim of this study was to determine the properties of a new luting cement, BioCem®, by evaluating shear bond strength (SBS) and flexural strength (FS). Materials and methods: A total of 60 extracted deciduous molars were included in this study. Samples were divided into two groups: Group I, Fuji I® ( Results: Upon comparing the SBS values of the luting agents and prepared enamel surfaces, glass ionomer cement (GIC) displayed the highest value, while BioCem® displayed the lowest. Upon comparing the FS values of the luting agents and prepared enamel surfaces, BioCem® performed better than GIC. Conclusion: BioCem® may be used as a luting agent for the cementation of stainless steel crowns (SSCs) on primary teeth. Clinical significance: BioCem®, a recently developed luting cement, may be used for cementing SSCs to the surfaces of prepared deciduous teeth; it exhibits significantly higher FS but lower SBS than that of GIC. How to cite this article: Shams SA, Nekkanti S, Shetty S. An

Indexed as

Dental enamelFlexural strengthLuting cementShear bond strength

Identifiers

PMID39372341
PMCPMC11451871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.