Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39372324›Full record

ArticleHippokratia

Prognostic factors of intraoperative accidental extubation during laryngeal surgeries.

D Marković, M Šurbatović, D Milisavljević, V Marjanović, B Stošić, T Kovačević, M Stanković

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippokratia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

D MarkovićClinic for Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy of University Clinical Center in Niš, Niš.
M ŠurbatovićClinic for Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Military Medical Academy, University of Defence, Belgrade.
D MilisavljevićOtolaryngology Clinic, University Clinical Center in Niš, Niš.
V MarjanovićClinic for Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy of University Clinical Center in Niš, Niš.
B StošićClinic for Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy of University Clinical Center in Niš, Niš.
T KovačevićOtolaryngology Clinic, University Clinical Center in Niš, Niš.
M StankovićOtolaryngology Clinic, University Clinical Center in Niš, Niš.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Head and neck surgery is considered high-risk for difficult intubation and accidental extubation. Laryngomicroscopy implies surgical manipulations at the level of the vocal cords. Also, this type of surgery demands a particular position for the patient during the whole surgical intervention. All of this makes accidental extubation even more possible. Methods: We included a total of 100 patients scheduled for laryngomicroscopy in the study. We have assessed patients' general and clinical data and provided necessary measurements. After the intubation, we documented the depth of the endotracheal tube at the level of the upper incisors and repeated the measurement after the surgical intervention. We recorded all possible difficulties encountered by the surgeon. Results: We found a significantly more frequent tube dislocation in patients from the difficult intubation group, with χ Conclusions: Modified Mallampati score and IIG are considered valuable parameters for rapid preoperative risk assessment of possible accidental extubation. The final depth of the endotracheal tube should be about two cm deeper than necessary, as long as there is adequate ventilation on both sides of the lungs. Difficult intubation undoubtedly represents a risk for accidental extubation occurrence. HIPPOKRATIA 2023, 27 (4):141-147.

Indexed as

airway extubationdifficult intubationrisk factorsUnplanned extubation

Identifiers

PMID39372324
PMCPMC11451509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.