Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39372255›Full record

ArticleAnimal reproduction2024

Evolution over the last 40 years of the assisted reproductive technologies in cattle - the Brazilian perspective for embryo transfer and resynchronization programs (part II).

Guilherme Pugliesi, Isabella Rio Feltrin, Ana Clara Degan Mattos, Amanda Guimarães Silva, Karine Galhego Morelli, Thiago Kan Nishmura, José Nélio de Sousa Sales

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal reproduction, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guilherme PugliesiUniversidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Reprodução Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zooctecnia, Pirassununga, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-5739-0677
Isabella Rio FeltrinUniversidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Reprodução Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zooctecnia, Pirassununga, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-9747-9385
Ana Clara Degan MattosUniversidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Reprodução Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zooctecnia, Pirassununga, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-6130-8688
Amanda Guimarães SilvaUniversidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Reprodução Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zooctecnia, Pirassununga, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-0918-4208
Karine Galhego MorelliUniversidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Reprodução Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zooctecnia, Pirassununga, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-8094-8747
Thiago Kan NishmuraUniversidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Reprodução Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zooctecnia, Pirassununga, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-5344-353X
José Nélio de Sousa SalesUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-8217-755X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The productivity of the beef and dairy industries depends directly on the reproductive efficiency and genetic gain of the herd, which are directly associated with the appropriate use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs). The objective of this review is to show from a Brazilian perspective the evolution over the last 40 years of ARTs related to ovulation resynchronization programs and embryo transfer in cattle. Despite significant improvements and high fertility obtained in timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocols (Sales et al., 2024 - Part I), the improvement of the use of

Indexed as

dopplerembryo transferestrusovulationresynchronization

Identifiers

PMID39372255
PMCPMC11452095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.