ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2024
Feasibility and Safety of a Home-based Electroencephalogram Neurofeedback Intervention to Reduce Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Cohort Clinical Trial.
Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurofeedback for functional neurological disorders: future directions for research and clinical practice.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026Review
- A home-based EEG neurofeedback treatment for chronic neuropathic pain-a pilot study.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and potential health benefits of an 8-week home-based neurofeedback intervention. Design: Single-group preliminary study. Setting: Community-based. Participants: Nine community dwelling adults with chronic neuropathic pain, 6 women and 3 men, with an average age of 51.9 years (range, 19-78 years) and with a 7-day average minimum pain score of 4 of 10 on the visual analog pain scale. Interventions: A minimum of 5 neurofeedback sessions per week (40min/session) for 8 consecutive weeks was undertaken with a 12-week follow-up baseline electroencephalography recording period. Main Outcome Measures: Primary feasibility outcomes: accessibility, tolerability, safety (adverse events and resolution), and human and information technology (IT) resources required. Secondary outcomes: pain, sensitization, catastrophization, anxiety, depression, sleep, health-related quality of life, electroencephalographic activity, and simple participant feedback. Results: Of the 23 people screened, 11 were eligible for recruitment. One withdrew and another completed insufficient sessions for analysis, which resulted in 9 datasets analyzed. Three participants withdrew from the follow-up baselines, leaving 6 who completed the entire trial protocol. Thirteen adverse events were recorded and resolved: 1 was treatment-related, 4 were equipment-related, and 8 were administrative-related (eg, courier communication issues). The human and IT resources necessary for trial implementation were identified. There were also significant improvements in pain levels, depression, and anxiety. Six of 9 participants perceived minimal improvement or no change in symptoms after the trial, and 5 of 9 participants were satisfied with the treatment received. Conclusions: It is feasible and safe to conduct a home-based trial of a neurofeedback intervention for people with chronic neuropathic pain, when the human and IT resources are provided and relevant governance processes are followed. Improvements in secondary outcomes merit investigation with a randomized controlled trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.