ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2024
Classification Into Different Patient Groups-A Step Toward Tailoring Care After Major Oncological Surgery?
Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of personas to tailor prehabilitation care for patients undergoing cancer surgery: An exploratory study.Internet interventions · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate how the distribution of patients in groups (based on subjective health experience) changes over time and to investigate differences in physical functioning and mental health between these patient groups. Design: An observational cohort study. Setting: University medical center. Participants: Patients who underwent gastrointestinal or bladder oncological surgery (N=98). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: The classification of patients into different groups based on the subjective health experience model (acceptance and perceived control), preoperatively and 1 and 3 months after discharge. Results: In total, 98 patients were included. Preoperatively, 31% of the patients were classified as having low acceptance and perceived control (group 4), and this proportion increased to 47% and 45% 1 and 3 months after discharge, respectively. These patients had significantly lower levels of physical functioning (preoperatively, 55 vs 61; Conclusions: The classification of patients to different groups provides insight in different levels of physical and mental health. However, frequent evaluation is important because of changes in patient groups over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.