Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39372228›Full record

ArticleBioelectricity2022

A Computational Approach to Explaining Bioelectrically Induced Persistent, Stochastic Changes of Axial Polarity in Planarian Regeneration.

Joel Grodstein, Michael Levin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioelectricity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joel GrodsteinDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael LevinAllen Discovery Center at Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7292-8084

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Morphogenesis results when cells cooperate to construct a specific anatomical structure. The behavior of such cell swarms exhibits not only robustness but also plasticity with respect to what specific anatomies will be built. Important aspects of evolutionary biology, regenerative medicine, and cancer are impacted by the algorithms by which instructive information guides invariant or stochastic outcomes of such collective activity. Planarian flatworms are an important model system in this field, as flatworms reliably regenerate a primary body axis after diverse kinds of injury. Importantly, the number of heads to which they regenerate is not determined genetically: lines of worms can be produced, which, with no further manipulation, regenerate as two-headed (2H) worms, or as "Cryptic" worms. When cut into pieces, Cryptic worms produce one-headed (1H) and 2H regenerates stochastically. Neural and bioelectric mechanisms have been proposed to explain aspects of the regenerative dataset. However, these models have not been unified and do not explain all of the Cryptic worm data. In this study, we propose a model in which two separate systems (a bioelectric circuit and a neural polarity mechanism) compete to determine the anatomical structure of a regenerate. We show how our model accounts for existing data and provides a consistent synthesis of mechanisms that explain both the robustness of planarian regeneration and its remarkable re-writability toward novel stable and stochastic anatomical states.

Indexed as

developmental bioelectricitygap junctionion channelmorphogenesisplanariaregenerationresting potentialvoltage

Identifiers

PMID39372228
PMCPMC11450330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.