ArticleTherapeutic advances in infectious disease
Management of isolated native tricuspid valve infective endocarditis by a multidisciplinary program: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Article in Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis Managed by a Multidisciplinary Endocarditis Team: A Retrospective Cohort Study.CJC open · 2026Article
- Antibiotic treatment duration for isolated methicillin-susceptibleJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025Article
- Partial Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotic Therapy for Endocarditis With Management by a Multidisciplinary Team: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Hepatitis C Treatment Outcomes for Patients With Infective Endocarditis Treated by an Interdisciplinary Team.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Isolated native tricuspid valve infective endocarditis remains a challenging disease to treat given the large number of patients with substance use disorder. There is limited data on the optimal treatment strategy and the impact of a multidisciplinary endocarditis program on outcomes for this population. Objectives: To assess the clinical outcomes associated with management of native tricuspid valve infective endocarditis by a multidisciplinary team. Design: Single-center, retrospective cohort study. Methods: Patient cases were identified from the registry of the institutional multidisciplinary endocarditis team. Patients with left-sided endocarditis, multivalvular endocarditis, prosthetic tricuspid valves and cardiac implantable electronic devices were excluded. Results: Between September 7th, 2021 and February 1st, 2024 72 consecutive patients with isolated native tricuspid valve infective endocarditis were identified. Sixty-six (91.7%) patients were managed medically. Five patients underwent percutaneous mechanical aspiration of tricuspid valve vegetations and one patient underwent tricuspid valve replacement during the index hospitalization. In-hospital mortality was 1.4% and 90-day mortality was 2.8%. Nineteen (26.4%) patients discharged before medically advised and 25% were re-admitted within 30 days. Ten (13.9%) patients underwent elective tricuspid valve replacements after outpatient follow-up. Conclusion: Among 72 patients with isolated native tricuspid valve infective endocarditis managed by a multidisciplinary endocarditis program over a 2.5-year period, in-hospital, 90-day mortality and 1-year mortality were very low despite low rates of percutaneous mechanical aspiration and tricuspid valve surgery. Multidisciplinary follow-up can lead to elective tricuspid valve surgery in a delayed fashion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.