Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39372026›Full record

ReviewACS omega2024

Fermentation of Biomass and Residues from Brazilian Agriculture for 2G Bioethanol Production.

Douglas José Faria, Anna Paula Azevedo de Carvalho, Carlos Adam Conte-Junior

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Douglas José FariaDepartment of Biochemistry, Chemistry Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941909, Brazil.
Anna Paula Azevedo de CarvalhoDepartment of Biochemistry, Chemistry Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941909, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9258-5947
Carlos Adam Conte-JuniorDepartment of Biochemistry, Chemistry Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941909, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6133-5080

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brazil is one of the world's leading producers of staple foods and bioethanol. Lignocellulosic residual sources have been proposed as a promising feedstock for 2G bioethanol and to reduce competition between food and fuels. This work aims to discuss residual biomass from Brazilian agriculture as lignocellulosic feedstock for 2G bioethanol production as bagasse, stalk, stem, and peels, using biorefining concepts to increase ethanol yields. Herein, we focused on biomass chemical characteristics, pretreatment, microorganisms, and optimization of process parameters that define ethanol yields for bench-scale fermentation. Although several techniques, such as carbon capture, linking enzymes to supports, and a consortium of microorganisms, emerge as future alternatives in bioethanol synthesis, these technologies entail necessary optimization efforts before commercial availability. Overcoming these challenges is essential to linking technological innovation to synthesizing environmentally friendly fuels and searching other biomass wastes for 2G bioethanol to increase the biofuel industry's potential. Thus, this work is the first to discuss underutilized lignocellulosic feedstock from other agrifoods beyond sugar cane or corn, such as babassu, tobacco, cassava, orange, cotton, soybean, potatoes, and rice. Residual biomasses combined with optimized pretreatment and mixed fermentation increase hydrolysis efficiency, fermentation, and purification. Therefore, more than a product with a high added value, bioethanol synthesis from Brazilian residual biomass prevents waste production.

Identifiers

PMID39372026
PMCPMC11447871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.