ArticleACS omega2024
Comparative Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Distribution of Hexahydrocurcumin Following Intraperitoneal vs Oral Administration in Mice Using LC-MS/MS.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic regulators polyphenols in neurodegenerative diseases: a promising intervention strategy.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Potential of Hexahydrocurcumin in the Regeneration and Protection of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated to determine hexahydrocurcumin (HHC) levels in mouse plasma, brain, liver, and kidneys using a negative ion mode electrospray ionization (ESI) source. Demonstrating a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 5 ng/mL, the method showed excellent linearity across a concentration range of 5-500 ng/mL in all tested matrices. Precision evaluations reported a coefficient of variation (CV%) of less than 13.19% for both intraday and interday measurements, while accuracy ranged from 95.13 to 105.07% across all quality control levels. HHC extraction recovery was consistently observed between 70.18 and 93.28%, with a CV% deviation of less than 15%. In the pharmacokinetic evaluation of HHC in mice following a single intraperitoneal (IP) or oral administration, a noncompartment analysis was utilized. After IP administration (40 mg/kg), the
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.