ArticleACS omega2024
Pollutants Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment of a Photovoltaic Powered Textile Electro-Fenton Wastewater Treatment System.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Textile wastewater poses a substantial environmental challenge due to the persistence of organic dyes. This study introduces a novel approach using photovoltaic (PV) powered electro-Fenton (EF) technology for effective treatment of textile wastewater. Acid orange 7 (AO7), methylene blue (MB), and malachite green (MG) were selected as representative organic dyes to validate the method under varying experimental conditions. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) highlighted the significant influence of pollutant type, pH levels, and current density on the degradation efficiency of the system, with optimal conditions observed at pH = 3 and high current density. To underscore the environmental benefits, a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted. The PV-powered EF system, when implemented in a textile mill, exhibited an energy payback time (EPBT) of 9.53 years, a greenhouse gas payback time (GPBT) of 4.45 years, and a life cycle cost (LCC) of 1.9 × 10
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.