Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39371949›Full record

ArticleJournal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)2024

A Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Different Endodontic Irrigating Solutions on Microhardness of Root Canal Dentin: An

Chris Cherian Geogi, Sandeep Dubey, Palak Singh, B Rajkumar, Praveen Singh Samant, Ananya Rawat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chris Cherian GeogiDept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Babu Banarasi Das College of Dental Sciences, Lucknow (U.P.), India.
Sandeep DubeyDept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Babu Banarasi Das College of Dental Sciences, Lucknow (U.P.), India.
Palak SinghDept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Babu Banarasi Das College of Dental Sciences, Lucknow (U.P.), India.
B RajkumarDept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Babu Banarasi Das College of Dental Sciences, Lucknow (U.P.), India.
Praveen Singh SamantDept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Babu Banarasi Das College of Dental Sciences, Lucknow (U.P.), India.
Ananya RawatDept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Babu Banarasi Das College of Dental Sciences, Lucknow (U.P.), India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statement of the Problem: During endodontic therapy, irrigation solutions applied in the root canal may affect the physicochemical properties of the dentinal wall, thereby changing its microhardness. This may adversely affect the sealing ability and adhesion of dental materials. Therefore, many studies have focused on the search for an ideal root canal irrigant that has a minimal effect on dentinal microhardness. Purpose: This Materials and Method: Ninety-five freshly extracted maxillary central incisor teeth with straight single canals were selected. These teeth were sectioned transversely at the level of the cementoenamel junction. The working length of each tooth was determined, and canal space was prepared by the HyFlex CM rotary file system. During instrumentation, normal saline was used for irrigation. Then, teeth were split longitudinally into two segments. According to the irrigating solution employed, samples were divided into five groups (n=19): normal saline (Group A), 3% sodium hypochlorite (Group B), 2% chlorhexidine (Group C), 5% calcium hypochlorite (Group D), and 0.2% nanochitosan (Group E).3 mL of the corresponding irrigating solution was administered for total15 minutes in each prepared sample. The Vickers micro-hardness tester was then used to assess micro-hardness. The data was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: All tested irrigating solutions decreased the dentinal microhardness. Samples irrigated with 5% calcium hypochlorite demonstrated dentinal microhardness of 42.43±1.62, which is the lowest among all the tested groups, followed by nano chitosan, sodium hypochlorite, and chlorhexidine. Samples treated with control group (saline) demonstrated the maximum microhardness of dentin in the present study. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this research, it can be concluded that the tested novel irrigating solutions, 5% calcium hypochlorite and 0.2% nanochitosan, were more detrimental to radicular dentin microhardness when compared with conventional endodontic irrigants.

Indexed as

Calcium hypochloriteChlorhexidineDentin MicrohardnessNanochitosanSodium hypochlorite

Identifiers

PMID39371949
PMCPMC11452603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.