Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39371802›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Advancing Periodontal Care: Development of a Novel Collagen-Chitosan-Bioglass Scaffold as a Substitute for Autologous Soft Tissue Grafts.

Hemaanhini Tamilmani, B Kiran Srinivas, Nidhita Suresh, K Saranya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hemaanhini TamilmaniPeriodontology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
B Kiran SrinivasPeriodontology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Nidhita SureshPeriodontology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
K SaranyaPeriodontology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Modern dentistry prioritizes aesthetic outcomes, making root coverage for gingival recession a key focus. Various approaches, including autologous grafts, address this issue, yet no substitute matches the properties of autogenous connective tissue grafts. The innovative collagen-chitosan-bioglass scaffold presents a promising solution, surpassing the limitations of the traditional methods. This scaffold blends the advantages of collagen with chitosan's antibacterial and regenerative properties, enhanced by bioglass, which promotes tissue healing through angiogenesis. It was evaluated for its physicochemical characteristics, as well as antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties, making it a promising solution for soft tissue management in dentistry. Materials and methods Chitosan, collagen, and bioglass were combined into a scaffold through the lyophilization process (freeze-drying). Chitosan was sourced from shrimp, collagen from bovine, and the bioglass 1% comprised 58% tetra-ethyl ortho silicate, 33% calcium silicate, and phosphorous pentoxide. After the scaffold was created, it was subjected to physicochemical characterization via scanning electron microscopic and infrared spectroscopic analysis. Its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties were evaluated using DPPH (2,2-diphenyl -1-picrylhydrazyl) assay and by measuring the scaffold's radical scavenging activity. Results This study employed infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy techniques to analyze the sample components and their morphology. The infrared (attenuated total reflection) analysis revealed various elements confirming the presence of all the biomaterials required to fabricate the scaffold. Scanning electron microscope imaging displayed a folded-like morphology with a porous structure. The protein denaturation inhibition increased from 25% at 50 μg of scaffold weight to 45% at 200 μg of scaffold weight. Similarly, the antioxidant activity increased, with values rising from 23% at 50μg to 35% at 200μg of scaffold weight. Conclusion The fabricated collagen-chitosan-bioglass scaffold demonstrates promising antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. These findings suggest that this scaffold holds significant potential as a viable substitute for soft tissue augmentation.

Indexed as

aestheticsbioglasschitosancollagengingival recession

Identifiers

PMID39371802
PMCPMC11452358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.