ArticleCureus2024
Implementation of a Virtual Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum at Black Lion Hospital, Ethiopia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the availability of formal point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training remains limited, and there is limited data on how to train providers in these countries to use POCUS. This study aimed to describe a virtual training workshop for physicians in Ethiopia, with the intention of serving as a model that could guide similar initiatives. Methods The authors developed and implemented a three-day virtual workshop in 2022 for physicians in the Department of Medicine at Addis Ababa University in Ethiopia. Participants in the workshop completed pre-workshop and post-workshop surveys, as well as knowledge assessments. The authors examined POCUS use prior to the workshop, the impact of the workshop on ratings of comfort level in performing POCUS, and the change in scores on a knowledge assessment before and after the workshop. Results We found that very few of the participants had prior formal POCUS training. Participants reported a significantly higher level of comfort in using POCUS for the assessment of patients (p < 0.001) and for procedural guidance (p < 0.001) after attending the workshop, compared to before. Scores on the post-test knowledge assessment were significantly higher than scores on the pre-test knowledge assessment (p < 0.001). Conclusion Our POCUS workshop was successfully implemented and delivered virtually to a group of physicians in Ethiopia, and it increased comfort levels in performing POCUS and POCUS knowledge. We hope that similar workshops can be implemented in other LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.