ArticleCureus2024
A Crowd Disaster Study: The Itaewon Seoul Crush.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent Halloween crowd crush incident in Itaewon, Seoul, Korea, highlights a woeful inadequacy in our collective knowledge about crowd disasters. Underscored is a lack of detailed information on the causes of death and the injuries sustained. While traumatic asphyxiation has been widely implicated as the primary cause of death, the wider spectrum of injury patterns and their causative mechanisms remain poorly identified. Challenges to advancing our understanding of crowd disasters include limited and restricted access to official reports, incomplete documentation, and reliance on unofficial sources for information. There is a need for targeted research to better understand crowd dynamics that lead to injuries. Future directions should prioritize better interdisciplinary collaboration, improved data sharing, and computer simulations to model real-world events. Further inquiry into human stampedes and crowd crushes, such as the Itaewon incident, is urgently needed to prevent similar tragedies; focusing on the types and mechanisms of injuries is a crucial first step to enhancing emergency preparedness and disaster response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.