ArticleCureus2024
Comparative Clinical Outcomes in the Treatment of Anterior Crossbite Using Three Different Appliances: A Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of clear aligners and Z-spring appliance on anterior crossbite correction and quality of life in the mixed dentition: a randomized clinical trial.The Angle orthodontist · 2025Trial
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anterior crossbite, a misalignment of the upper front teeth in which the bite is behind the lower front teeth, is a common dental condition in mixed dentition. This case series examines the clinical results of three orthodontic appliances, namely Catlan's appliance, the removable finger-spring appliance, and the 2x4 appliance, in the management of anterior crossbite. The first case study involves a seven-year-old patient with a single-tooth crossbite. The patient was treated using a 2x4 appliance, which resulted in a satisfactory correction of the problem within a reasonable treatment duration. The therapy was comfortable for the patient and resulted in high patient satisfaction levels. The second case involves a nine-year-old patient with a crossbite on both of their permanent central incisors. The patient was treated using a Catlan's appliance, which had the shortest treatment duration but resulted in the highest level of discomfort. The third case study focuses on a nine-year-old patient with a single-tooth crossbite. The condition can arise from dental or skeletal disparities and, if not managed, can cause periodontal damage, aberrant enamel erosion, and temporomandibular joint disorders. Prompt intervention using various appliances is essential for rectifying the crossbite and averting potential consequences. This study uniquely compares Catlan's appliance, the removable finger-spring appliance, and the 2x4 appliance, each distinct in design and application, and evaluates a range of outcome measures, including treatment duration, occlusal improvement, patient comfort, and adverse effects. All three appliances, such as Catlan's appliance, the removable finger-spring appliance, and the 2x4 appliance, are effective in correcting anterior crossbite, demonstrating that multiple treatment options can achieve successful outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.