ReviewCureus2024
Associated Factors and Mortality of Arrhythmia in Emergency Department: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Prediction of Non-Cardiac Organ Failure in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients with Arrhythmia: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac arrhythmias represent a major concern in the emergency department (ED), particularly given their association with significant morbidity and mortality. This narrative review examines the various factors influencing arrhythmias and their impact on patient outcomes in emergency settings. Managing complex supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) during acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and severe cardiovascular conditions remains challenging, despite advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Ventricular arrhythmias frequently forecast worse outcomes during hospital stays and heighten the chances of sudden cardiac death and cardiac arrest, especially within the initial 30 days after a heart attack. The incidence of arrhythmias in ED is increasing due to demographic changes and higher rates of chronic illnesses such as diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. These comorbidities, coupled with lifestyle factors such as smoking and alcohol consumption, complicate arrhythmia management, especially among older adults and males. Rapid and precise ECG interpretation in the ED is crucial for identifying specific arrhythmia types and initiating appropriate treatments. Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most prevalent form of rapid heart rhythm originating above the ventricles, notably impacts patient outcomes, particularly in cases of AMI and heart failure. In the ED, managing AF focuses on preventing strokes with thromboprophylaxis and employing risk assessment tools such as CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores. The analysis highlights how risk factors like hypertension, obesity, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and diabetes intricately influence the development and worsening of AF. Optimizing AF treatment outcomes requires a multidisciplinary approach involving cardiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care specialists. Future research should prioritize evaluating the effectiveness of preventive and therapeutic interventions for AF, integrating new risk factors and genetic insights to enhance prediction and management strategies. Understanding the factors contributing to arrhythmias and mortality in the ED underscores the importance of timely and accurate diagnostic and therapeutic measures to improve patient care and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.