ArticleCureus2024
Thromboembolic Disease and COVID-19: Experience of a University and Emergency Hospital During the Pandemic.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCOVID-19 leads to vasculopathy, which is linked to both a prothrombotic state and an impaired immune response. A notable increase in pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) has been documented.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients who were admitted with venous thromboembolic disease (VTD) in the largest university and emergency hospital in Romania, between May 1, 2020, and April 30, 2021. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the presence (Group 1) or absence (Group 2) of COVID-19 virus infection at the time of admission. The aim of this study was to assess the characteristics of VTD in COVID-19 patients and to compare the clinical and paraclinical parameters of the Group 1 and Group 2 patients admitted for VTD in an emergency hospital during the first two waves of the pandemic (12 months). We compared clinical, biological, and imaging parameters and applied binary logistic analysis for the predictive models.
resultsA total of 198 patients were diagnosed with VTD (at admission or during the hospitalization); out of 33,373 patients hospitalized, 43 (21.7%) were diagnosed with COVID-19 (12.2% with mild COVID-19, 61.0% moderate, and 26.8% severe). Group 1 showed higher heart rates and leukocytes, more severe pulmonary changes (p<0.05), higher N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), and high sensitivity troponin I (hs-cTnI) (p>0.05). Not reaching statistical significance, the mortality tended to be higher in Group 1. These patients were admitted to the intensive care units for longer (3.5 vs. 1.5 days, p > 0.05). The minimum value of thrombocytes during hospitalization was inversely correlated with the risk of death. Interestingly, the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score was not predictive for in-hospital death in Group 1, but only in Group 2 (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.821, CI 0.689-0.952).
conclusionIndividuals with severe manifestations of COVID-19 remain vulnerable to developing VTD and are prone to adverse outcomes. The efficacy of PESI as a predictive tool for in-hospital death is non-significant. Further refinement of specific predictive scores tailored to VTD associated with COVID-19 is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.