ArticleCureus2024
The Pattern of Practice in the Management of Early Diabetic Kidney Disease.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gaps in Guideline-Concordant Care in Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Real-World Analysis of Screening, Treatment, and Associated Factors.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives Diabetes is a leading cause of kidney failure in various regions worldwide. To detect renal disease in individuals with diabetes, screening typically involves evaluating the glomerular filtration rate and measuring albuminuria. Although there are established guidelines for these screenings, adherence to them varies. This study aims to examine the prevalence of albuminuria screening among adults with diabetes mellitus (DM) and to assess the different practices in managing these patients across primary and tertiary care settings. Methods This cross-sectional observational study involved adult patients with DM attending outpatient clinics in both primary and tertiary care settings. Patient data were gathered using a standardized form, excluding those with established chronic kidney disease (CKD) who were under nephrology care. Results The study included 1,010 patients, with 303 (30%) from primary care clinics and 707 (70%) from tertiary care clinics. The cohort comprised 582 (58%) females, with a median age of 62 years (IQR: 55-70), and approximately 990 (98%) had type 2 DM (T2DM). Annual albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) screening was conducted for 498 out of 1,010 patients (49%) (95% confidence interval {CI}: 46%-52%). Screening compliance was notably higher in primary care settings compared to tertiary care clinics. Older patients (over 60 years) and those with hypertension or cardiac conditions were less likely to undergo screening. Among those screened, 185 of 498 patients (37%) (95% CI: 33%-41%) had abnormal albuminuria (ACR > 3). Conclusion Albuminuria is a significant indicator of progressing renal disease and cardiovascular risk. The annual screening rate for albuminuria in diabetic patients is inadequate. Primary care physicians show better adherence to screening guidelines compared to their tertiary care counterparts. Increasing physician awareness about the importance of screening could improve guideline compliance and mitigate the adverse effects of albuminuria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.