ArticleIndian journal of endocrinology and metabolism
Variability in Sex Assignment at Birth and Etiological Diagnosis of Differences of Sex Development: A Ten-Year Institutional Experience from Assam.
Article in Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Differences of sex development (DSD) also known as disorders of sex development encompass a wide spectrum of conditions with varying clinical presentations across different age groups. This study aims to analyse various aetiologies of DSD in Assam and the variability of sex assignment at birth. Methods: This retrospective study included the records of people with DSD presenting to a tertiary centre over 10 years. The age at presentation, sex assignment, gender identity, degree of ambiguity, pertinent hormonal and radiological investigations were noted. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Results: The age of presentation varied widely, with peaks during infancy and puberty. The most prevalent DSD type was 46, XY DSD (61.2%), followed by 46, XX DSD (19.7%) and sex chromosome DSD (19.1%). Among people with 46, XY DSD, androgen biosynthesis disorders were dominant, particularly 5-a reductase 2 deficiency (46.7%). Among 46, XX DSDs, the most common subtype was androgen excess disorders (51.7%) comprising 21a-hydroxylase deficiency (48,3%) and 11β-hydroxylase deficiency (3.4%). Turner syndrome was most prevalent among sex chromosome DSD (71.4%) with others being Klinefelter syndrome, 45, XO/46, XY mixed gonadal dysgenesis and 46, XX/46, XY chimerism. The degree of ambiguity was variable depending on the type of DSD and similarly, sex assignment at birth was influenced by the level of ambiguity. Conclusion: The study underscores the significance of comprehensive approaches for DSD diagnosis and management, especially in regions with limited resources. The insights gained from this clinical study offer valuable understanding and aid in addressing the complexities associated with these conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.