ArticleHealth services insights2024
Exploring the Impediments: Investigating Barriers to Participation in Phase-2 Cardiac Rehabilitation Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Among Thai Patients.
Article in Health services insights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the known benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), the rate of participation is low following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). The reasons for this lack of participation are unclear and there have been few studies investigating this, particularly in Asian countries. The present study aimed to address this lack of information and identify reasons for non-participation in phase-2 CR among patients who underwent CABG. Methods: We enrolled 42 patients who underwent CABG or CABG combined with valvular heart surgery in a university hospital between October 2016 to September 2018. Patients who participated in phase-1 but not phase-2 CR were interviewed by phone following an 11-item questionnaire. Results: The rate of participation in phase-2 CR was only 12.5%. The most frequently reported reason for non-participation was "Did not know that there was phase-2 CR" (61.9%), followed by "Transportation problems" (31%). "Unable to take leave due to work schedule" was fairly frequently reported (19%) as was "Did not participate due to chronic diseases and complications" (14.3%). Conclusion: Our study revealed low participation in phase-2 CR, despite its well-known benefits. The primary reason identified was a lack of awareness and understanding among patients regarding phase-2 CR. This highlights the need for targeted interventions aimed at increasing knowledge and awareness of the benefits and availability of CR. Additionally, it is crucial to establish an efficient referral system that ensures seamless transitions from the initial cardiac treatment to the rehabilitation phase. Implementing these strategies is expected to boost CR participation, leading to improved patient outcomes and overall cardiac health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.