Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39371559›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2024

Virtual reality for preoperative patient education: Impact on satisfaction, usability, and burnout from the perspective of new nurses.

Jiyoung Kim, Donghyun Kim, Sang-Ha Oh, Hyeokjae Kwon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiyoung KimCollege of Nursing, Woosuk University, Wanju-gun 55338, South Korea.
Donghyun KimDepartment of Medical Science, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon 35015, South Korea.
Sang-Ha OhDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon 35015, South Korea.
Hyeokjae KwonDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon 35015, South Korea. kwon.hyeokjae@cnuh.co.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional paper-based preoperative patient education is a struggle for new nurses and requires extensive training. In this situation, virtual reality technology can help the new nurses. Despite its potential benefits, there are studies on patient satisfaction but there is limited information on the usability of virtual reality (VR) technology for new nurses in giving preoperative education to patients.

aimTo investigate the impact on satisfaction, usability, and burnout of a system using VR technology in preoperative patient education.

methodsThe study involved 20 nurses from the plastic surgery ward and 80 patients admitted between April and May 2019. Each nurse taught four patients: Two using traditional verbal education and two using virtual reality. The System Usability Scale, After-Scenario Questionnaire, and Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) were employed to evaluate the impact of these education methods.

resultsThe VR education groups showed a statistically higher satisfaction than the traditional verbal education groups. Among the three subscales of the MBI, emotional exhaustion and personal accomplishment improved statistically significantly. VR was also better in terms of usability.

conclusionThis study suggests VR enhances usability and reduces burnout in nurses, but further research is needed to assess its impact on depersonalization and objective measures like stress and heart rate.

Indexed as

BurnoutPatient educationPreoperative careProspective studiesSatisfactionUsabilityVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID39371559
PMCPMC11362887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.