Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39371523›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in computational neuroscience2024

Electroencephalogram-based adaptive closed-loop brain-computer interface in neurorehabilitation: a review.

Wenjie Jin, XinXin Zhu, Lifeng Qian, Cunshu Wu, Fan Yang, Daowei Zhan, Zhaoyin Kang, Kaitao Luo, Dianhuai Meng, Guangxu Xu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The classification of walking and phases of gait using EEG: a scoping review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wenjie Jin *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
XinXin Zhu *Rehabilitation Medicine Center, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Affiliated Jiaxing TCM Hospital, Jiaxing, China.
Lifeng Qian *Rehabilitation Medicine Center, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Affiliated Jiaxing TCM Hospital, Jiaxing, China.
Cunshu WuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Fan YangRehabilitation Medicine Center, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Affiliated Jiaxing TCM Hospital, Jiaxing, China.
Daowei ZhanRehabilitation Medicine Center, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Affiliated Jiaxing TCM Hospital, Jiaxing, China.
Zhaoyin KangRehabilitation Medicine Center, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Affiliated Jiaxing TCM Hospital, Jiaxing, China.
Kaitao LuoRehabilitation Medicine Center, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Affiliated Jiaxing TCM Hospital, Jiaxing, China.
Dianhuai MengDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Guangxu XuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) represent a groundbreaking approach to enabling direct communication for individuals with severe motor impairments, circumventing traditional neural and muscular pathways. Among the diverse array of BCI technologies, electroencephalogram (EEG)-based systems are particularly favored due to their non-invasive nature, user-friendly operation, and cost-effectiveness. Recent advancements have facilitated the development of adaptive bidirectional closed-loop BCIs, which dynamically adjust to users' brain activity, thereby enhancing responsiveness and efficacy in neurorehabilitation. These systems support real-time modulation and continuous feedback, fostering personalized therapeutic interventions that align with users' neural and behavioral responses. By incorporating machine learning algorithms, these BCIs optimize user interaction and promote recovery outcomes through mechanisms of activity-dependent neuroplasticity. This paper reviews the current landscape of EEG-based adaptive bidirectional closed-loop BCIs, examining their applications in the recovery of motor and sensory functions, as well as the challenges encountered in practical implementation. The findings underscore the potential of these technologies to significantly enhance patients' quality of life and social interaction, while also identifying critical areas for future research aimed at improving system adaptability and performance. As advancements in artificial intelligence continue, the evolution of sophisticated BCI systems holds promise for transforming neurorehabilitation and expanding applications across various domains.

Indexed as

adaptiveBCIbrain-computer interfaceclosed-loopelectroencephalographyneurorehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39371523
PMCPMC11449715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.