ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2024
Mass media guidelines for sports concussion: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Mass media guidelines for sports concussion: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sports concussion is a common and costly injury, and increased public injury awareness could help reduce costs. Many factors, including public messages about sports concussion by the sports media, shape public injury awareness. Empirical analyses show that this messaging can be poor. The proposed solutions include providing media guidance, but little is known about this topic. This scoping review will enable a systematic search and synthesis of guidance materials for improved health messaging of sports concussion by the mass media. The five review stages are (1) determining the research question, (2) identifying relevant materials, (3) selecting relevant information, (4) data extraction and (5) analysis and presentation of the results. A brief protocol will be registered on a recommended platform (Open Science Framework). The search strategy will access 20 databases, as well as Google and Google Scholar, and include hand searching. Selected materials must describe or provide mass media guidance for sports concussion by a health-affiliated authority. Eligibility will be confirmed via a two-stage screening process, including independent assessment. Data from eligible materials will be extracted and collated in tables. If sufficient or appropriate materials are identified, the synthesis will draw on key evaluative resources related to injury management and guideline development methodologies. The knowledge synthesis will use descriptive and narrative methods to determine what is known on this topic, including documenting existing guidance (content and properties) and using the extracted data to inform recommendations for future guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.