Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39371408›Full record

ArticleNPJ quantum information2024

Gate-set evaluation metrics for closed-loop optimal control on nitrogen-vacancy center ensembles in diamond.

Philipp J Vetter, Thomas Reisser, Maximilian G Hirsch, Tommaso Calarco, Felix Motzoi, Fedor Jelezko, Matthias M Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ quantum information, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Philipp J Vetter *Institute for Quantum Optics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2812-3996
Thomas Reisser *Peter Grünberg Institute - Quantum Control (PGI-8), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Maximilian G HirschInstitute for Quantum Optics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Tommaso CalarcoPeter Grünberg Institute - Quantum Control (PGI-8), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Felix MotzoiPeter Grünberg Institute - Quantum Control (PGI-8), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4756-5976
Fedor JelezkoInstitute for Quantum Optics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Matthias M MüllerPeter Grünberg Institute - Quantum Control (PGI-8), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recurring challenge in quantum science and technology is the precise control of their underlying dynamics that lead to the desired quantum operations, often described by a set of quantum gates. These gates can be subject to application-specific errors, leading to a dependence of their controls on the chosen circuit, the quality measure and the gate-set itself. A natural solution would be to apply quantum optimal control in an application-oriented fashion. In turn, this requires the definition of a meaningful measure of the contextual gate-set performance. Therefore, we explore and compare the applicability of quantum process tomography, linear inversion gate-set tomography, randomized linear gate-set tomography, and randomized benchmarking as measures for closed-loop quantum optimal control experiments, using a macroscopic ensemble of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond as a test-bed. Our work demonstrates the relative trade-offs between those measures and how to significantly enhance the gate-set performance, leading to an improvement across all investigated methods.

Indexed as

Information theory and computationQuantum informationQubits

Identifiers

PMID39371408
PMCPMC11446828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.