Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39371371›Full record

ArticleForensic chemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2024

Beyond Fentanyl Test Strips: Investigating Other Urine Drug Test Strips for Drug Checking Applications.

Edward Sisco, Meghan G Appley, Elise M Pyfrom, Caleb J Banta-Green, Chelsea L Shover, Caitlin A Molina, Ben Biamont, Elizabeth L Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic chemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Edward SiscoNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Meghan G AppleyNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Elise M PyfromNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Caleb J Banta-GreenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Chelsea L ShoverDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Caitlin A MolinaDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ben BiamontDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Elizabeth L RobinsonNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of immunoassay test strips for the detection of fentanyl in drug samples has become commonplace in harm reduction, law enforcement, public health, customs, and forensic science settings for testing drug product. With the increase of xylazine in the drug supply in recent years, use of xylazine test strips has also increased. As use of test strips expands, a desire to implement them for other drugs may emerge. However, since these strips are designed for urine testing, it is important to understand their applicability to testing drug product. In this work, we investigate the utility of seven types of urine immunoassay test strips - amphetamine, benzodiazepine, cocaine, methamphetamine, nitazene, opiate, and xylazine - for drug checking applications. Reproducibility, sensitivity, cross-reactivity, and the effect of prolonged exposure to elevated temperatures were studied. Generally, the tests were found to be reproducible, able to detect trace (μg/mL) levels of the analyte of interest, and minimally affected by prolonged storage at elevated temperatures. Nearly all tests showed cross-reactivity with compounds other than the analyte of interest, highlighting the need to better understand these limitations prior to implementation in a drug checking scenario. The viability of expired cocaine, fentanyl, and methamphetamine test strips was also interrogated, and little to no change in sensitivity was found even though the tests were multiple years expired.

Indexed as

Drug CheckingHarm ReductionImmunoassay

Identifiers

PMID39371371
PMCPMC11450658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.