Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39371351›Full record

ArticleBiomedical signal processing and control2025

Model based fitting of pattern reversal visually evoked potentials provides a reliable characterization of waveform components.

Carlyn Patterson Gentile, Geoffrey K Aguirre, Kenneth J Ciuffreda, Nabin R Joshi, Kristy B Arbogast, Christina L Master

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical signal processing and control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carlyn Patterson GentileChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3501 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia PA, 19104.
Geoffrey K AguirreUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3501 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia PA, 19104.
Kenneth J CiuffredaState University of New York College of Optometry, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3501 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia PA, 19104.
Nabin R JoshiState University of New York College of Optometry, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3501 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia PA, 19104.
Kristy B ArbogastChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3501 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia PA, 19104.
Christina L MasterChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3501 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia PA, 19104.

Funding

Trigeminovascular sensitization in post-traumatic headache: electrophysiologic and blood biomarkers in youthK23NS124986 · NINDS · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Carlyn Anne Patterson Gentile · 2022 to 2026
$1.0M
NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS124986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To introduce a novel approach to analyzing pattern reversal visual evoked potentials (prVEPs) using a difference-of-gammas model-based fitting method. Methods: prVEP was recorded from uninjured youth ages 11-19 years during pre- or postseason sports evaluation. A difference-of-gammas model fit was used to extract the amplitude, peak time, and peak width of each of four gamma components. The within session reliability and stability of fits across a 6-month period were determined. To demonstrate an application of this analysis, changes in parameters across age were determined. Results: A difference-of-gammas model consisting of four gamma functions was fit to the prVEP of 151 youth. Peak times and amplitudes of functions corresponded to standard measures of the N75, P100, and N135 components respectively, and a late gamma peak (mean peak time 219 ms). We extracted the peak width, which increased with each subsequent temporal peak. Parameter fits were reliable within sessions (correlation coefficient >0.92 for all measured parameters; good agreement on Bland-Altman calculation) and were stable between sessions separated by less than 6 months (correlation coefficient > 0.90). Standard peak analysis metrics extracted from the difference-of-gamma model fits were largely consistent with gold-standard peak analysis measurements. Conclusions: The difference-of-gammas model provides a stable and reliable within-participant representation of the global temporal variability of prVEP waveforms across a large sample of youth. Significance: Using difference-of-gammas model to characterize the global temporal variability of the prVEP waveform offers a promising direction to enhance analysis for identifying and following subtle changes in neurologic conditions.

Indexed as

adolescentmodel-based fittingvisual evoked potentials

Identifiers

PMID39371351
PMCPMC11449069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.